The Forensic Science Geek of the Week
Please visit the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com FaceBook fan page.
The week 106 “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week” honors goes to: Brian Manchester, Esquire
- Brian Manchester is the one standing
- According to his website:
- 11 years of experience handling cases in Federal and State Court
Brian is managing partner of Manchester & Associates
Education
Thomas Cooley Law School, Lansing, MI, 2000 / Jurist Doctorate
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 1995 / Business Management – Economics
Training
Supreme Court Certified Death Penalty Defense
Educational Chairman for the Pennsylvania Association of Drunk Driving Defense Attorney’s
Organizations
– Member National College for DUI Defense
– Member National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
– Member Pennsylvania Bar Association
– Federal Bar for Middle and Eastern District of Pennsylvania
– National College for DUI Defense
– American Chemical Society
– Society of Forensic Toxicologists
– Pennsylvania Association for Drunk Driving Defense Attorneys
Congratulations to our Forensic Science Geek of the Week winner
OFFICIAL QUESTION:
2. What is it typically used for in forensic science?
Our Geek of the Week answered:
The machine is a vortexer. How it works is you place a tube containing a liquid mixture on the vortexer then the vortexer shakes the tube rapidly. This shaking is done to homogenize the sample. It is like a mini-paint shaker.
The liquid typically associated with our profession is blood. One example is when TCA is added to a whole blood sample it is vortexed to homogenize the sample prior to centrifugation. Another example is when blood is frozen and then thawed it must be homeginized so the vortexer is used to do so.
[BLOGGER’S NOTE: There were 2 honorable mentions this week
John Tenn wrote: “The mini vortexer is typically used for mixing small test samples usually in small test tubes. Having used this exact model, i know it operates in either a touch mode or a continuous mode.”
Laura Magnuson wrote: “This is a typical vortexer. It’s used to quickly mix combined liquids when pressed down onto the black rubber top by creating a vortex within the vial. They can also be used to suspend cells within a solution.”]
The Hall of Fame for the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week:
Week 1: Chuck Ramsay, Esquire
Week 2: Rick McIndoe, PhD
Week 3: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 4: Stephen Daniels
Week 5: Stephen Daniels
Week 6: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire
Week 7: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 8: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 9: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 10: Kelly Case, Esquire and Michael Dye, Esquire
Week 11: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 12: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 13: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 14: Josh D, Lee, Esquire
Week 15: Joshua Dale, Esquire and Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 16: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 17: Joshua Dale, Esquire
Week 18: Glen Neeley, Esquire
Week 19: Amanda Bynum, Esquire
Week 20: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 21: Glen Neeley, Esquire
Week 22: Stephen Daniels
Week 23: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 24: Bobby Spinks
Week 25: Jon Woolsey, Esquire
Week 26: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 27: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire
Week 28:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 29: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 30: C. Jeffrey Sifers, Esquire
Week 31: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 32: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 33: Andy Johnston
Week 34: Ralph R. Ristenbatt, III
Week 35: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 36: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 37: Jeffrey Benson
Week 38: Pam King, Esquire
Week 39: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 40: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.
WEEK 41: UNCLAIMED, IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 42: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 43:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 44: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 45: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 46:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 48: Leslie M. Sammis, Esquire
Week 49: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 50: Jeffery Benson
Week 51: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 52: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 53: Eric Ganci, Esquire
Week 54: Charles Sifers, Esquire and Tim Huey, Esquire
Week 55: Joshua Andor, Esquire
Week 56: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 57: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 58: Eric Ganci, Esquire
Week 59: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 60: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 61: William Herringer, Esquire
Week 62: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.
Week 63: Ginger Moss
Week 64: Richard L. Holcomb, Esquire
Week 65: John L. Buckley, Esquire
Week 66: Jeff Sifers, Esquire
Week 67: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 68: Dr. Barbara Vonderhaar, PhD.
Week 69: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 70: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 71: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 72: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 73: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 74: Kim Keheley Frye, Esquire
Week 75: Mehul B. Anjaria and Peter Carini, Esquire
Week 76: Kim Keheley Frye, Esquire
Week 77: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 78: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 79: Kevin Feeney, Esquire
Week 8o: Justin Harris, Esquire
Week 81: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 82: Jay Tiftickjian, Esquire
Week 83: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.
Week 84: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 85: Pat Arata, Esquire
Week 86: George Schiro
Week 87: Jay Tiftickjian, Esquire
Week 88: Rocky Babson, Esquire
Week 89: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU.
Week 90: Joseph Rome, Esquire
Week 91: Chuck Ramsay, Esquire
Week 92: Laura Magnusson
Week 93: John L. Buckley, Esquire
Week 94: Unclaimed. It could be you!
Week 95: George Schiro
Week 96: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.
Week 97: Unclaimed. It could be you!
Week 98: Kevin Feeney, Esquire
Week 99: Laura Magnusson
Week 100: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 101: Unclaimed. It could be you!
Week 102: Laura Magnusson
Week 103: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 104: Laura Magnusson
Week 105: Unclaimed. It could be you!
Week 106: Brian Manchester, Esquire