The Forensic Science Geek of the Week
Please visit the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com FaceBook fan page.
The week 91 “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week” honors goes to: Chuck Ramsay, Esquire
- According to our Geek’s website, the following is offered:
Chuck Ramsay has practiced Criminal Defense since 1995 and gained acquittals in nearly every type of case from DWI to Murder. He prides himself on being on the cutting edge of criminal defense and has helped pioneer a number of defenses in Minnesota, including faulty eyewitness identification, false confessions, and the right of a defendant to present alternative suspects to a jury. Today he practices primarily in the area of DWI/DUI criminal defense and appeals, and civil forfeitures arising out of alleged criminal conduct. He has tried dozens of cases to verdict, the majority of which have resulted in a not guilty. An effective appellate lawyer, Chuck has appeared before the Minnesota Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court in approximately 75 cases.
Ramsay is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and of William Mitchell College of Law. He is also a graduate of the prestigious Robert F. Borkenstein Course on Alcohol and Highway Safety: Testing Research and Litigation at the University of Indiana. In 2007. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice (MSCJ) – a prestigious group of attorneys limited in number to 50 of the top criminal defense attorneys in the state. Chuck is also an active member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), and the Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (MACDL). Chuck has been named Super Lawyer, being among the top 40 of the criminal defense lawyers in Minnesota in the last two years. A Certified Intoxilyzer 5000 operator, Ramsay has testified about the shortcomings of the Intoxilyzer 5000. Chuck also regularly serves as a faculty member at continuing education classes for health care professionals where he lectures on the topics of boundaries and ethics, and represents various professionals before their licensing boards and in the legal system. Chuck has been named Super Lawyer by Minnesota Law & Politics, Twin Cities Business Monthly and Minneapolis St. Paul Magazine. This honor is bestowed upon the top 5% of Minnesota lawyers as selected by their peers. In 2007 and again in 2008, he was among the top 40 of all the criminal defense lawyers in Minnesota. Throughout his career he has successfully challenged the constitutionality of unjust laws and invalid and unreliable scientific testing methods. Most recently he intervened in the federal source code lawsuit and obtained access to the actual source code for the Intoxilyzer 5000. He is one of the three lead counsel of the Source Code Coalition. Chuck is also widely recognized at the leading attorney on attacking Minnesotas urine testing program, having obtained court orders suppressing the urine testing as unscientific, unreliable and outright absurd.
Congratulations to our Forensic Science Geek of the Week winner
OFFICIAL QUESTION:
- Forensic Science Geek of the Week Challenge
- 1. Who is pictured above?
2. What is he best known for?
Our Geek of the Week answered:
Gary Wells is a distinguished professor of Psychology at Iowa State University and the Stavish Chair in the Social Sciences. Currently he is the Director of Social Sciences for the American Judicature Society’s Center for Forensic Science and Public Policy. He presently serves as a consultant to judges, law enforcement, defense counsel, and prosecution counsel in state and federal criminal cases involving eyewitness memory, crime investigation procedures, and evidence evaluation. He is best known for demonstrating the lack of reliability of eye witness identification. He is particularly known for improving eyewitness identifications for lineups. He published studies showing that sequential lineup presentation significantly reduced the amount of false identifications made by witnesses rather than using simultaneous lineups.
[BLOGGER’S NOTE: We had a lot of honorable mentions (they weren’t as quick as Chuck) including:
- Justin Harris who answered “1. I believe that is Gary Wells (who I believe holds a PhD).
2. He is one of the leading experts in forensic eyewitness identification. He is a strong advocate for policy changes that follow the “double-blind” approach to identification procedures. He was instrumental in developing updating approaches to identifications, as well.” - Laura Magnuson who answered “That is Gary Wells. He is best known for his work with flaws in eyewitness identifications.”]
The Hall of Fame for the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week:
Week 1: Chuck Ramsay, Esquire
Week 2: Rick McIndoe, PhD
Week 3: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 4: Stephen Daniels
Week 5: Stephen Daniels
Week 6: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire
Week 7: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 8: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 9: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 10: Kelly Case, Esquire and Michael Dye, Esquire
Week 11: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 12: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 13: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 14: Josh D, Lee, Esquire
Week 15: Joshua Dale, Esquire and Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 16: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 17: Joshua Dale, Esquire
Week 18: Glen Neeley, Esquire
Week 19: Amanda Bynum, Esquire
Week 20: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 21: Glen Neeley, Esquire
Week 22: Stephen Daniels
Week 23: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 24: Bobby Spinks
Week 25: Jon Woolsey, Esquire
Week 26: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 27: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire
Week 28:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 29: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 30: C. Jeffrey Sifers, Esquire
Week 31: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 32: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 33: Andy Johnston
Week 34: Ralph R. Ristenbatt, III
Week 35: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 36: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 37: Jeffrey Benson
Week 38: Pam King, Esquire
Week 39: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 40: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.
WEEK 41: UNCLAIMED, IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 42: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 43:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 44: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 45: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 46:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 48: Leslie M. Sammis, Esquire
Week 49: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 50: Jeffery Benson
Week 51: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 52: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 53: Eric Ganci, Esquire
Week 54: Charles Sifers, Esquire and Tim Huey, Esquire
Week 55: Joshua Andor, Esquire
Week 56: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 57: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 58: Eric Ganci, Esquire
Week 59: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 60: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 61: William Herringer, Esquire
Week 62: UNCLAIMED IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 63: Ginger Moss
Week 64: Richard L. Holcomb, Esquire
Week 65: John L. Buckley, Esquire
Week 66: Jeff Sifers, Esquire
Week 67: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 68: Dr. Barbara Vonderhaar, PhD.
Week 69: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 70: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 71: Ron Moore, Esquire
Week 72: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 73: Josh D. Lee, Esquire
Week 74: Kim Keheley Frye, Esquire
Week 75: Mehul B. Anjaria and Peter Carini, Esquire
Week 76: Kim Keheley Frye, Esquire
Week 77: Mehul B. Anjaria
Week 78: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 79: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 8o: Justin Harris, Esquire
Week 81: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 82: Jay Tiftickjian, Esquire
Week 83: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!
Week 84: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 85: Pat Arata, Esquire
Week 86: George Schiro
Week 87: Jay Tiftickjian, Esquire
Week 88: Rocky Babson, Esquire
Week 89: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU.
Week 90: Joseph Rome, Esquire
Week 91: Chuck Ramsay, Esquire