Forensic Science Geek of the Week
Thanks to the combined inspiration of Christine Funk, Esquire and Chuck Ramsay, Esquire, a new twist of this blog is being introduced. A weekly fun forensic science challenge/trivia question. The winner will be affectionately dubbed “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week.”
Rules:
- The challenge will be posted Sunday morning 12 noon EST.
- Answers to the challenge will be entered by responding to this blog post or the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com FaceBook fan page.
- All comments that are answers to this blog will released after 9pm EST.
- The first complete and correct answer will be awarded the envious title of “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week”
- “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week” is entitled a one time post of his/her picture on this blog and the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com FaceBook fan page. The coveted title will be his/her for that week. Additionally, a winner will be allowed one link to one webpage of his/her choice. Both the picture and the weblink is subject to the approval of Justin J McShane, Esquire and will only be screened for appropriate taste.
- The winner will be announced Sunday night.
- A winner may only repeat two times in a row, then will have to sit out a week to be eligible again. This person, who was the two time in a row winner, may answer the question, but will be disqualified from the honor so as to allow others to participate.
- This is for learning and for fun. EVERYONE IS ENCOURAGED TO TRY TO ANSWER THE WEEKLY QUESTION. So give it a shot.
Here it is:
The www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com “Forensic Science Geek of the Week” challenge question. Remember the first full and complete answer wins the honor and also gets his/her photo displayed, bragging rights for the week and finally website promotion.
OFFICIAL QUESTION:
-
- www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week Challenge:
-
-
-
-
OK. A 5 parter:A. What is this device generally called?B. What specifically is it in terms of make and model?C. What is it designed to do according to the manufacturer?D. What is the yellow jobby right there in the middle, what is it supposed to be and what is its significance?E. Is it part of a truly validated process that is indeed suitable for its intended purpose? Why or why not?
The Hall of Fame for the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week:
Week 1: Chuck Ramsay, EsquireWeek 2: Rick McIndoe, PhD
Week 3: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 4: Stephen Daniels
Week 5: Stephen Daniels
Week 6: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire
Week 7: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 8: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 9: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 10: Kelly Case, Esquire and Michael Dye, Esquire
Week 11: Brian Manchester, Esquire
Week 12: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 13: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.
Week 14: Josh Lee, Esquire
Week 15: Joshua Dale, Esquire and Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire
Week 16: Christine Funk, Esquire
Week 17: Joshua Dale, Esquire
Week 18: Glen Neeley, Esquire
Week 19: Amanda Bynum, Esquire
Week 20: Josh Lee, Esquire
WEEK 21: IT COULD BE YOU!!!!
-
-
-
Joshua Dale says:
That’s the darn there alcohol stimulator – it heats up and stimulates those alcohol molecules so that if you hook up the tube to your date’s nose, you can get her sniffing the demon vapors … keep that thing at 93.2 degrees Fahrenheit!
Glen Neeley says:
A. This is generally called a simulator.
B. Guth 34C model.
C. Simulate a human breath test to check calibrations of the breath tester.
D. NIST Mercury-in-Glass serialized reference thermometer. The Simulator must be heated to 34 degrees C. The thermometer tells the monkey that that it is okay to push a button to run a check.
E. If the intended purpose is to support convictions of innocent people, then yes. However, if the intended purpose is to simulate a human breath, it does not do that. It is a closed container heated to a controlled temperature. A human is not a closed jar and the temperature is not controlled. A human has too many variables to be compared to a closed jar.
Justin J. McShane says:
This is very, very funny. Thanks