Week 80 Forensic Science Geek of the Week Challenge is announced

The Forensic Science Geek of the Week

Please visit the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com FaceBook fan page.

Forensic Science Geek of the Week

The week 80 “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week” honors goes to: Justin Harris, Esquire

Justin Harris, Esquire
Justin Harris, Esquire

According to our Geek, the following is offered:

Justin Harris joined Greco & Associates, P.C. in September, 2011. He is a native Houstonian, born and raised in Northwest Houston, before his family relocated to Magnolia, Texas in 1997. Justin takes pride in his hard work, attention to detail, professionalism and working very hard to fight for his clients in each and every case.

Justin began working in the legal field as a project assistant for one of the top law firms in the country in 2000. Over the next decade, Justin worked on thousands of cases. Throughout college and law school, he worked for various law firms in both Austin and Houston, each specializing in different areas of the law. After his graduation from Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas, Justin took several years to gain legal experience before he embarked upon his lifelong dream of attending law school. He enrolled at South Texas College of Law in 2008 and fulfilled his dream in 2011 when he graduated and successfully passed the Texas bar exam, gaining admittance to the State Bar of Texas. During law school, Justin clerked for several prominent Houston criminal defense attorneys, working in Harris, Fort Bend, Montgomery, Galveston, Brazoria, Grimes, Jefferson and Liberty Counties. At each, he gained invaluable experience, being mentored by trial and appellate attorneys as well as former prosecutors. Upon graduation from law school, he received offers to join different law firms, but settled on Greco & Associates, P.C. based upon their reputation for fighting hard for their clients’ cases and after seeing their dedication to each client. After three years of working while attending law school, Justin has worked closely on hundreds of criminal cases and participated in over a dozen criminal trials.

Justin joins Greco & Associates, P.C. with nearly twelve years of legal experience at different positions within various law firms. In addition to his love of the law, Justin greatly enjoys playing the guitar, attending live music events, traveling and spending time with his family and friends.

Congratulations to our Forensic Science Geek of the Week winner!

OFFICIAL QUESTION:

Forensic Science Geek of the Week Challenge
Forensic Science Geek of the Week Challenge

1. What is pictured above?

2. What is it used for?

3. Are there any known issues with respect to its forensic suitability? If so, what?

Our Geek of the Week answered:

Here’s my best guess:

1. A distance measuring wheel, sometimes also called a “rolling distance measuring wheel.”

2. It is rolled along a surface (usually the ground) from one point to another point to provide a distance that is measured by a small odometer-type gauge (typically).  It is most often appropriate for measuring distances when a typical tape measure would not work. The known circumference of the wheel is used to provide a linear measurement through the “odometer”.

3. Several issues with its reliability: First, if the distance between point A to point B involves bumps, dips or inundations in the surface, the distance provided by the wheel will be affected and inaccurate.  Second, depending on the quality of the particular device, the “odometer” may not be as accurate as another.  Third, and most significantly, a lot of the wheel’s accuracy is dependent upon the user–if the user does not keep close, firm contact with the surface the wheel rolls over, it may allow the wheel to spin without being in contact with the surface; this will also distort the measurement provided by the wheel.  Finally, and, admittedly, I am not completely sure of this one, the devices are typically unable to be calibrated.  After prolonged use, the circumference of the wheel may diminish (if even slight, it will become more pronounced over longer distances).  The gears in the “odometer” may slacken, etc.

[BLOGGER’S NOTE: Very honorable mention goes to Ron Moore, Esquire who answered: “This is a Roll-a-tape. Its used in larger crime scenes and especially vehicular accidents to make distance measurements for documenting the position of evidence. Its not the most accurate device for measuring distances, but then again, millimeter accuracy usually isn’t required. there are more modern methods available that use dGSP and lasers for measuring. I’ve never heard of a roll-a-tape being calibrated, nor have I heard of evidence being excluded because the roll-a-tape might have been a little off.”]

The Hall of Fame for the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Forensic Science Geek of the Week:

Week 1: Chuck Ramsay, Esquire

Week 2: Rick McIndoe, PhD

Week 3: Christine Funk, Esquire

Week 4: Stephen Daniels

Week 5: Stephen Daniels

Week 6: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire

Week 7: Christine Funk, Esquire

Week 8: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 9: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 10: Kelly Case, Esquire and Michael Dye, Esquire

Week 11: Brian Manchester, Esquire

Week 12: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 13: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 14: Josh D, Lee, Esquire

Week 15: Joshua Dale, Esquire and Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire

Week 16: Christine Funk, Esquire

Week 17: Joshua Dale, Esquire

Week 18: Glen Neeley, Esquire

Week 19: Amanda Bynum, Esquire

Week 20: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 21: Glen Neeley, Esquire

Week 22:  Stephen Daniels

Week 23:  Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 24: Bobby Spinks

Week 25:  Jon Woolsey, Esquire

Week 26: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 27: Richard Middlebrook, Esquire

Week 28:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 29: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 30: C. Jeffrey Sifers, Esquire

Week 31: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 32: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 33: Andy Johnston

Week 34: Ralph R. Ristenbatt, III

Week 35: Brian Manchester, Esquire

Week 36: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 37: Jeffrey Benson

Week 38: Pam King, Esquire

Week 39: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 40: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.

WEEK 41: UNCLAIMED, IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 42: Steven W. Hernandez, Esquire

Week 43:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 44: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 45: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 46:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 48: Leslie M. Sammis, Esquire

Week 49: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 50: Jeffery Benson

Week 51: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 52: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 53: Eric Ganci, Esquire

Week 54: Charles Sifers, Esquire and Tim Huey, Esquire

Week 55: Joshua Andor, Esquire

Week 56: Brian Manchester, Esquire

Week 57: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 58: Eric Ganci, Esquire

Week 59: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 60: Brian Manchester, Esquire

Week 61: William Herringer, Esquire

Week 62: UNCLAIMED IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 63: Ginger Moss

Week 64: Richard L. Holcomb, Esquire

Week 65: John L. Buckley, Esquire

Week 66: Jeff Sifers, Esquire

Week 67: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 68: Dr. Barbara Vonderhaar, PhD.

Week 69: Christine Funk, Esquire

Week 70: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 71: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 72: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 73: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 74: Kim Keheley Frye, Esquire

Week 75: Mehul B. Anjaria and Peter Carini, Esquire

Week 76: Kim Keheley Frye, Esquire

Week 77: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 78: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 79: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 8o: Justin Harris, Esquire

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *